Britney Spears

Forum

Pages: 1 2 3 4
I think Britney Spears is cool and so is her little sister, Jamie-Lynn Spears (Have u seen her show, All That? It's funny as hell!) and u haters r just jealous of her! By the way, if anybody knows Britney Spears' e-mail address or her little sisters, PLEASE send it to me!
Thanks!

>>By goodgirl16   (Saturday, 29 May 2004 22:39)



i don't listen to her at all,though i love "everytime".anyways,just wanted to say that she doesn't annoy me at all.i find her attractive and a good person.

>>By Eli_Molko   (Wednesday, 14 Jul 2004 02:16)



okay, everybody I think that she is grown up and everybody just to back oof coz it's not her falt that she is this way okay it is her manager and also I think that she is nice she is not dum okay. Besides you can't stay a child you know she has to grow up and alot of artist act this way and if you don't like what brittney spears is doing then you shouldn't like all the other artist coz they all doin the same coz you guys are hittin her pretty hard and I don't think is right.

>>By blue Jey   (Thursday, 7 Oct 2004 00:08)



Sorry to say this, but anyone who says: "I think we must support the president, because he is the president..." seems kinda dum to me, especially when this president is sending out young guys to die for oil.

>>By Campking   (Thursday, 7 Oct 2004 16:03)



yes so lets look at the situation if we weren't over there fighting eh? So a guy comes into your house and shoots your mum and pop and is about to shoot you, do you drop your guna dn say *peace brother* and hope that everyhting will magically get better? Bush is sending them to fight Al Queda, and you talk to any soldier and they support this cause 100%, I know, I've interviewed plenty of them. Whta seems kinda dumb are the people that say we should just sit peacefully like lame ducks

>>By Artemis7.0   (Thursday, 7 Oct 2004 23:49)



did britney actually said that: "I think we must support the president, because he is the president..." aaaaaaaaaaaaaahahaahaaha.
who said she understands of politics.
Artemis7.0-you're soooo losing it!

>>By Eli_Molko   (Friday, 8 Oct 2004 00:23)



Bush is sending them to fight Al Queda, and you talk to any soldier and they support this cause 100%, I know, I've interviewed plenty of them. Whta seems kinda dumb are the people that say we should just sit peacefully like lame ducks


When you are so in to interviewing soldiers, you must also be in to following the news. If so, you could have heard Rumsfeld say last wendesday that there has never been shown any proof of links between Al-Quaida and Saddam Houssein the moment President Bush ordered the attck of Iraq. First the reason to move in to Iraq with several weapons of Mass destruction the possesion of Mass destruction weapons (which ofcourse America as largest weapon production country and largest posessor of weapons of mass destruction can NOT tolerated). As we all know now there are still none found, and there was no sufficiant proof to say there were any weapons. But still America stays there, for The USA is now there to bring democracy and to take away this vicious dictator out of power (which he managed to built up with the help of american fundings?). To me all the reasons Bush has for now given for the invation of Iraq are evading the true reason, which is OIL. So let the boys go there for richmans OIL and come home in a body bag. If you wanna support that, go ahead. But don't cry when you are drafted.

And to stay in your line of examples Artemis7.0, Imagine the FDA kick in your front door, because they have falls proof that you are in the posession of 1000 xtc pills and a kilo of cocaine. They have been bugging you for some time, asking you to hand it over to you, but you keep telling them you don't have it (which is tru, for you are a true patriot). But what ever you say they don't believe you (you are guilty until proven innocent).
So this day they drop into your house, they kill your mom, your dad, your younger sister and drop a bomb on the wedding of your cousin.
And then after 5 months of tearing your house apart, they understand that you were not, and actually never in the posession of any illegal drugs (they found silver paper which could have been proof that you once were in the possesion of cocaine, but still) they tell you that they only came to your house to help you built it up......

Do you think you would trust them, and love them like your saviour? As if thy were send by God?


I am sorry, artemis, but I have the impression that you are missing out on th whole picture. Maybe a good lesson for you would be to count all the death that fell before 911 in other countries because of American violence or american dollar funded violence. This might bring you some understanding as to why 50% of the rest of the world hates america. I don't, but I do understand.

>>By Campking   (Friday, 8 Oct 2004 14:47)



First of all, this is not a political debate. The fact is that Britney Spears commented on politics when she is not well informed. That is not a crime, there is nothing wrong with that. The fact that people paid any attention to it is simply stupid. Regardless of the politics behind it, there is a question of her talent. Well, I personally do not care for her music. I feel that it is simplistic, base, and calling her a musician should be an insult to musicians everywhere. But calling her an artist is not wrong. She may not be good, but she does produce a simple art. She is obviously talented as a vocalist and dancer, she was in the Mickey Mouse Club, a fact that many people overlook. She was one of the best people to try out for that role. Why she isn't using her voice more often, I don't know. She does try to use her body too much, but once she started doing that, it became difficult to stop without losing her (male) fan base. She is also talented as an entrepeneur. Whether you like her or not, you know her name, recognize her, and she knows that will sell her products.

>>By pgrmDave   (Friday, 8 Oct 2004 17:10)



The fact is that Britney Spears commented on politics when she is not well informed. That is not a crime, there is nothing wrong with that. The fact that people paid any attention to it is simply stupid.

Saying you support someone because he or she is in a function and you support her/him because of that function has nothing to do with being badly informed. That to me is plain stupidity. it has nothing to do with being badly informed.

>>By Joris Spikkelaar   (Monday, 11 Oct 2004 12:52)



Look at it from her point of view. Assuming she is poorly informed, which I don't doubt she is, she would like any President that doesn't interfere with her too much. Since Bush hasn't hurt her personally, he is a good President to her, and thus is to be trusted and supported until he interferes with her. I'm not saying that she isn't stupid, only that this particular instance cannot prove it.

>>By pgrmDave   (Monday, 11 Oct 2004 22:28)



guys,no one should expect her to have a view on something like that... i mean,i don't think she even cares,cause she just doesn't understand it and doesn't care...she isn't used to do stuff on her own,what's left for thinking...i watched some time ago,an interview with her,and they asked her about a thing she has made on her own soon and she's proud of.and you know what she said?! she said: "catching a cab" she was sooooo excited she had managed to catch a cab on her own!!!! and that can speak enough about her-there are always people aroung her that take care of everything-she wasn't able to become independant at all,however stupid this is...so,what-you expect her to actually have a view on politics? of course,when she doesn't have a view,why would she bother to comment? well, i guess she has to have a point,and as someome has told her so,she has done it...
and she's not like Madonna,you know,doing things on her own,or actually being famous cause she has to make a statement or something....she's just...i don't know...being there,making money,entertaining people...she's just a product. otherwise as i said,i am totally not annoyed by her, cause she has done no wrong to anyone,and she isn't malicious...or at least it seems so.and there are some good dance hits she,(or whoever writes her music) has done,so...i don't know why people try to judge her or make those biiig statements about her...she's a simple young lady,aaand...
i guess it's not that easy to live a life like hers...may be she deserves a little respect for coping with all that-no personal life,stress all the time,bla-bla...

>>By Eli_Molko   (Tuesday, 12 Oct 2004 02:35)



Eli I thought u had good taste in music. Now I find you here?

>>By spikee   (Tuesday, 12 Oct 2004 02:38)



What does it say about you, that you are here to find out she is here? Maybe you should first read what someone is saying before writting something this lame, spikee.........(?)

>>By Campking   (Tuesday, 12 Oct 2004 20:30)



hahahah,spikee dear- Campking is very very right- read what i have written - i haven't mentionned anywhere that i listen to her! i said she has some good dance hits- and that's true actually! slave for you and toxic are very good to dance to!!!

>>By Eli_Molko   (Tuesday, 12 Oct 2004 21:37)



Did Britney Spears have anything to do with the writing / arranging / producing of Slave 4 U and Toxic? Of course not! Slave 4 U is a Neptunes song (I think - what am I, some kind of expert like Campking?). Don't know about Toxic, but in my opinion it has a great beat that is ruined only by Britney's terrible vocals.

>>By spikee   (Wednesday, 13 Oct 2004 01:04)



okay,here's a quote from my previous post here:"and there are some good dance hits she,(or whoever writes her music)... "
so,i am aware darling that she doesn't make her own music,and she doesn't even pretend or claim doing it. she doesn't even sing live...so,everyone knows about her talant. she's doing a good job though,in performing the songs...:)))
and why the hell are you making me argue with you on that- i don't even like her,i don't listen to her!!! i don't wanna argue about it! especially with you! and if you so wanna know she has something to do with the writing of slave for you:)))) ok, i may be wrong though...
all i said i don't have anything against her,cause she isn't claiming she has talant! she isn't claiming it at all.and she's not malicious. and i said she deserves a little respect, cause i guess it's not easy coping with all that fame thing...that's all i said!:))))

>>By Eli_Molko   (Wednesday, 13 Oct 2004 01:22)



OK.. maybe I should start reading your entire posts!

You said "she's doing a good job though,in performing the songs". That's exactly where I entirely disagree with you. She isn't doing a good job. All she is, is a voice... and I think she has a terrible one. I can't stand. Toxic, and Outrageous, etc, would be quite listenable songs if they were sung by say Beyonce or even Christina Ag. But because Britney is singing them, they are horrendous.

I'm sorry for arguing with you.

"and she's not malicious" - I agree

"and i said she deserves a little respect, cause i guess it's not easy coping with all that fame thing" - I disagree with my whole heart...... do you actually believe yourself when you wrote this? As far as coping with the fame goes.... she has got herself married one night when she was drunk off her tits, she claimed to be a virgin and 'saving herself till marraige' then goes out and screws any guy she can find, and what part of having millions of dollars is not easy to cope with anyway. I haven't seen her do anything charitable with the money.... but I might be wrong of course.

>>By spikee   (Wednesday, 13 Oct 2004 01:32)



well, i actually it's non of our business to judge her,or whoever.
anyways,fuck it spikee,i don't wanna fight with you, especially for someone that i don't give a damn about!

>>By Eli_Molko   (Wednesday, 13 Oct 2004 02:43)



I hope you mean you don't give a damn about Britney Spears, not that you don't give a damn about me.

>>By spikee   (Wednesday, 13 Oct 2004 02:54)



The moment some steps in to the public area I believe it is our god given job to judge what these people are doing, especially if the whole thing is done for popularity and making money.
britney here is supposed to be a role model in some sort of way, maybe not on purpose, but she is to some kids. Therefore if we, the people, believe she is being a bad role model, we are allowed to judge her on that.
She chose this proffesion, she wanted to be popular, and now she is. But the moment you are a star, everything you do an say in the public area is open for us. Eat it or beat it, I would say. Still I don't believe she has a hard life. Ahard life is when you have to live on social support whilst trying to raise 3 children, which keeps you from getting a jobm because your husband bailed out the moment he heard of the 3rd coming so you are all alone to raise them and no time left to work to get a better earning.
When Britney closes her door she can bath in luxury, get what she wants and close her eyes of all the pain in the rest of the world, just so she can keep believing the worst thing that can happen is having a broken heart for Justin cheated on you. Oh yeah, and having a hard time hailing a cab..........................

>>By Joris Spikkelaar   (Wednesday, 13 Oct 2004 23:29)



Ok ,Britny Spears...Well i aint the type that hates so so all y'all fans out there dont stress!
She makes good dough which means she is either real lucky or real clever. True, her song aint exacly high quality tunes but they are catchy and most of the teens out there like that.These days she is looking more sexy and her music is a little bit more serious! Dont know her as a person so cant comment on that because that would just be foolish! Good on her for making that much $!!! Thats why i rate her for!

>>By Ladyj   (Thursday, 14 Oct 2004 02:04)



aham,yeah,i would rate her for that too!

>>By Eli_Molko   (Thursday, 14 Oct 2004 02:22)



I think Britney Spears is one of the best bands ever

>>By spikee   (Thursday, 14 Oct 2004 02:27)



I concider Britney Spears to be too damn slutty to take serious - if you could take here serious anyway: "her" music and especially her way of singing is simply too ridiculous to be taken seriously.

>>By Hexegot   (Friday, 15 Oct 2004 19:25)



I think Britney is stupid if she does not pay any attention to politics... that should be important to everyone, even pop stars.
Britney's voice is bad. Her main appeal is her dancing... I think. Is it?

>>By Bitch Fit   (Friday, 15 Oct 2004 22:06)



Who cares about dancing? She is just a face and a body. And as I said before, I find her voice awful and UNLISTENABLE.

>>By spikee   (Saturday, 16 Oct 2004 03:07)



"Is it just me, or do I smell skank?"

When Brittney started out she was this pretty pop princess, now she's the queen of the skanks. Her music has descreased in quality and so has her personality. Lip locking with Madonna, wearing skirts short of enough to show things that I personally don't want to see, and inviting boys "in". I don't find that appealing, but then again I'm not a guy, all of the guys fawn over her. If i were a guy the only way I'd fawn over her is if I wanted STD's.

I know this was a little harsh and a little more judgemental and bashing than my postings normaly are but I really feel strongly about this subject and the decrease in quality of idols for young children. These people are setting examples for the youth, do you really want kids dressing and acting like her, I know I might sound "old" in that but I'm only 14, I was refering to children such as my sister who wears cut off shirts at the age of 7.

-Wednesday-

>>By Wednesday   (Thursday, 4 Nov 2004 03:44)



but if your daughter or little sister is wearing short skirts at seven...u can't really blame that on britney spears, whether u like to admit it or not, it's the parents' fault....they should be able to have a say so in what their youngins wear and listen to and what not...

>>By odnanref   (Thursday, 4 Nov 2004 21:44)



cuz when u think about it, britney spears is a human being, she has feelings and she's entitled to fuckin up every now and then, being a celebrity shouldn't deprive her of that privilege that most of us "non-famous people" take for granted. she's not here to raise our young ones or to instil postive morals in them....that's what our parents are for.

>>By odnanref   (Thursday, 4 Nov 2004 21:52)



i must admit ive danced to some of Britney's songs before but..come on! She'd not an "artist" she cant sing, shes a glamorized commercial actor she sells sex and pepsi, and me personally i don't want to be her, nor am i jealous of her marriages of Federline(whatever his name is). Shes just really a pathetic example of how commercial mainstream music has become. and yes she and other like her have a part in young girls dressing obscenely if she is first targeted to young girls and then "grows up" by grinding on a chair

please anyone who really dissagrees with me on this email me because i really cant understand how you could possibly feel the way you do

>>By Pappie170   (Sunday, 7 Nov 2004 06:06)



Pages: 1 2 3 4
The discussion board is currently closed.